Why the Others?

By
"And when he had lived long, and was borne to his grave a hoary corpse, followed by Faith, an aged woman, and children and grandchildren, a goodly procession, besides neighbors not a few, they carved no hopeful verse upon his tombstone, for his dying hour was gloom." 

 I don't have much to say, I just have this question: why would those who remember the man who dies, regardless of how he believed/ lived, not leave an encouraging verse or thought on his tombstone. I understand the idea of the man's last hour being gloom, being not celebratory for he was not much of a joyful individual nor faithful, BUT why would those whom he left behind not leave an encouragement. Had his way of thought/ dissatisfaction with religion run into their lives, or is this just a device for picturing his death as gloomy...?
P.S. I commented on Faith and Michael's posts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Honest Reaction to Reading "Honest to God"

By
Originally I said in my last blog post that I liked this book, but I have sort of changed my mind. It is not that I hate it or anything, it is just weird and I don’t really agree with what John Robinson is saying most of the time. I appreciate that he is trying to write something different and new, but my problem is that some of the ideas are just a little too radical for my taste, and I disagree with him a lot. In the seventh and last chapter of the book, Robinson himself acknowledges his radicalness and writes about how he knows that this type of thought on religion is controversial. He goes on to write how all great thinkers were seen as controversial when they first started and says, “Every new religious truth comes as the destroyer of some other god”. To further prove this point, he uses the example of how Socrates was condemned as an atheist for not believing in multiple gods, and while it is true that Socrates was a great philosopher who was not seen as so when he was alive, I ...
Read more

Raphael and a man walk into Eden...

By
I'll just start off by saying Raphael is one of the three named archangels in Scripture we hear the least about, and I thoroughly enjoy just reading and seeing his name pop up. Regardless, I want to touch on Adam's recounting of his own..."birth". Take that with a grain of salt as Adam was not physically born, but rather he simply became. In truth, we should all be able to give a similar account to their first memory of consciousness and fully aware. Adam was created, but he realized he could walk, talk, and speak without first learning. Imagine being able to think clear thoughts in your native language and be a functioning individual right out of the womb. It's an incredible thought, and Adam can give a recall of this like it were yesterday...which it might have been, who knows? Aside from that, Adam could even give an account to Eve's creation. The Bible says nothing pertaining to this matter so this is where Milton does a bit of adlibbing and writes around ...
Read more

Honest to God

By
I honestly never really thought to challenge that old mindset of "Heaven is directly in the clouds." But then again, I haven't really thought of it like that since I was really  little. Now I see it more of just another world entirely that's separate from our own and cannot be accessed by physical means of the earth. Still technically "up there" but not really, if that makes much sense. This quote right in the first part of the book  really  struck a chord "But now it seems there is no room for him, not merely in the inn, but in the entire universe:" Mainly because it's so heavily true for the world today. Issues with people not wanting to attend church because it's out of the way and they have no room  for it. It's a good parallel on the author's part to reflect it back to Jesus' birth. Just for the sake of jumping to a different topic to end this post on, I do appreciate the fact that Robinson's main and driving goal wi...
Read more